We consider 3 different phases for evaluation.
Under standard operation, the number of patients seeking treatment (after being diagnosed) is also the number of patients being treated monthly in order to keep the number of waiting patients constant.
Under restricted operation due to the COVID-19 outbreak or other event, the number of patients being treated becomes lower, so there is a damming, increasing the waiting time for treatment initiation. This event has certain duration.
After the event ends, the number of patients treated monthly must be preferentially higher than standard operation, as the waiting lines may grow substantially. To regain standard waiting times, this additional effort should be made until the number of waiting people returns to normal.
To perform a simulation, you must enter the information correctly:
From this data it is possible to estimate needed time of effort to recovery after the COVID-19 pandemic, the peak and average waiting time to treatment during COVID-19 outbreak and mitigation period, the number of patients exposed to the risk of dying, the peak value of added risk due to increased time to treatment initiation (TTI) delay and also the baseline risk of dying due to prolonged TTI when the time exceeds 67 days (in this specific model).
A simulation is performed which estimates the waiting time (TTI) for each simulated individual. The arriving time of the individuals depend on the input rate and is linearly distributed through time. The exit time of an individual depends on the output rates experienced inside the simulation and the number of accumulated patients.
Based on a simplification of the model in the paper by Murphy et al. [2016], the hazard ratio is estimated as a function of the TTI. Hazard is considered 100% (normal) for waiting times lower than a threshold (TTI=67 as in the paper), and growing linearly with the TTI according to the expression: 100% + 100 (slope*TTI+intercept). The values for slope (0.003) and intercept (-0.2) are obtained from the graph of the model.
A Hazard of 120%, for example, means there is 20% additional chance of dying after treatment initiation above the standard expected risk due to the unnatural circumstances, in particular, longer waiting times to treatment.
The information provided by the simulation can be understood as:Click here to fill in with working example data.
COCIC, release R01. June, 2020. This calculator is provided under MIT licence. Note: The COCIC was developed and is freely available online. Anyone has the permission to access, use, and share data as long as this study is cited. By using the online version provided, you agree to have your input data collected. Copyright 2020 Universidade de São Paulo - Faculdade de Medicina, and Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica - Laboratório de Bioengenharia Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.